Revisiting an idea

Home/Working as an Artist/Revisiting an idea

Revisiting an idea

I once had a art professor comment to me that most artists (student artists in this particular case) give up on an idea too quickly. I think that is some truth in that. While there are certainly many who take a particular idea and beat it to death with infinitesimal variations, (and many dealers who encourage it) there is a lot to be said for approaching the same topic or image multiple times, either together or spread out over time.

The question is, have you said everything you have to say? Or perhaps, have you observed everything there is to observe. If you are pushing yourself at all as an artist, your work will evolve naturally. Your techniques will change, your color palate and sensibilities will become more refined, or, at least, change.

Whenever I think about this subject, I think of Claude Monet. There were cathedrals, haystacks and, of course, water lilies. He painted them over, and over, and over. Yet I don’t think that he was simply grinding out something he knew would sell. Each of those paintings was the result of a keen observation. He was chasing an elusive representation of what his eyes saw, and what his hand could capture.

Some may feel that Monet’s work was more decorative than deep (I don’t happen to agree) but there are many other examples where the same images or ideas come up over and over. Jim Dine’s Hearts and Bathrobes, David Smith’s Stainless Steel cubes, Mark Rothko’s shimmering rectangles of color… each were working with an idea that they felt compelled to return to.

I recently came back to an image that I have worked before. In 2006 I produced a 3 plate woodcut of a decommissioned sugar factory that is near my studio. The shape of the structures, the textures of the metal and the play of light all caught my interest. My first version of this differed from much of my work at the time, since I did not push to a full range of values.

Composition 137
2006
Color Woodcut
13 1/4″ x 9 7/8″
Copyright 2006, Dean Russell Thompson
 

In the second version, produced within a couple of weeks of the first, I replaced one of the plates, and went very dark. The colors in this version were more closely connected (as opposed to the complementary scheme of the first). A different time of day, but clearly the same image.
Composition 137a
2006
Color Woodcut
13 1/2″ x 9 7/8″
Copyright 2006, Dean Russell Thompson

I have often thought I would come back and work this again, but other ideas kept intruding (and there was a studio to set up). I finally decided it was time, but I wanted to manipulate more than just the color/value scheme. For the new print, I changed the composition somewhat. I always felt that the originals were a little too centrally composed for my tastes. The color scheme is similar to the first, but there are four plates in the new version, printed with two sets of closely related colors. One of the background plates also has some textures which come through in the play of the colors (although at the scale of this photo it is kind of hard to see).

Do I dislike the originals? No, and it is clear to me from peoples reactions to them that there is something about them that captures the eye. But for me it was time to think it through anew. Something tells me that I am not done yet.

Amalgamated
2010
Color Woodcut
14 1/2″ x 7 3/8″
Edition of 10
Copyright 2010, Dean Russell Thompson

About the Author:

Dean Russell Thompson is an Artist and Printmaker working in Loveland, CO.